Family Court Judges are Above the Law? Allowed to Criminally Violate the Law and Get Away with this?

The Family Judge in my Divorce Case granted my spouse, a party to this same suit, the
“Court Appointed Receiver” This is actually a VIOLATION of the Texas State “Laws of Receivership”
section 64.002

Tarrant County Family Court Case #324-502659-11
Fort Worth, Texas

19 years of marriage
Multimillion Dollar Estate

The Judge granted my spouse the “Court Appointed Receiver” of our estate upon the Opposing Attorney’s Request. This is a violation
of the “Laws of Receivership” which prohibits a party to the same suit to be the “Court
Appointed Receiver.”

Apparently the Judge is above the Law and can do whatever she wants to do.

Then The Judge never held my spouse accountable as he illegally converted and transferred
all of our Community Property funds to himself while he was the “Court Appoint Receiver.”

The Judge actually AIDED my spouse in committing FRAUD in my Divorce Case by granting him the
Court Appointed Receiver then never holding my spouse accountable as he illegally converted
all of our Community Property Assets to himself.

The Opposing Counsel then lied in Court Hearings claiming we had NO Community Property ASSETS
to divide AFTER my spouse illegally converted all of our Community Property ASSETS to himself.

The Opposing Counsel was allowed to prepare the Final Decree and illegally converted and transferred
all of our Community Property funds to my spouse in the Final Decree. This was NEVER agreed to.

I flat out refused to sign the Final Decree. My Family Attorney refused to sign the Final Decree
agreeing with the “Contents”

My ex spouse was ALLOWED to commit fraud in my Divorce Case by the Judge and the Opposing Attorney.

I filed for a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit. The Opposing Attorney showed up alone then flat
out lied to the District Judge on the Sworn Inventory that she illegally added to the Final Decree as a
reference…. never included the Sworn Inventory that she referenced and stated that all the assets on this
Sworn Inventory be awarded to my Spouse !!! UNREAL!!

The Sworn Inventory that the Opposing Attorney was ALLOWED to add as a reference to the Final Decree was dated
12 months into our Divorce Process and prepared AFTER my spouse illegally converted all our ASSETS to himself as the Court Appointed
RECEIVER…. The Opposing Attorney showed up to Court and flat out lied to the Judge by claiming that the Sworn Inventory
dated 8/24/2012 was prepared at the Onset of our Divorce Process. The ONSET of our Divorce process was 8/24/2011.

The Opposing Attorney lied in Court and got away with this. She actually committed FRAUD and aided my spouse in committing
Fraud!!!

It is outrageous what is ALLOWED to go on in the Family Courts!! Off the Charts Shocking!!

What Goes on in Family Court System is OFF the Charts SHOCKING !!! Judges NEED to be held Accountable for their ACTIONS and Criminal Misconduct in the Court Rooms !!!


What Goes on in the Family Court System will SHOCK YOU!!

What I endured in the Tarrant County Family Court System Is SHOCKING !!! I was COMPLETELY STRIPPED OF ALL MY LEGAL
RIGHTS BY THE ASSOICATE JUDGE!!!

CASE # 324-502659-11
Multimillion Dollar Divorce Case

The horrific level of ABUSE that I endured for two years in the Tarrant County Family Courts was SEVERE and Traumatizing! ALL the FRAUD and criminal misconduct ALL allowed and aided by the Associate Judge and the Corrupt Opposing Attorney was horrific and devastating.

The Associate Judge granted my spouse the “RECEIVER” of our entire estate. She never required ANY accountability from my spouse. While he was granted full control of our entire estate he transferred all our community property funds to his NEW ACCOUNTS. He was allowed to cash in on our Life insurance Policies and deposit all this in his new Accounts. The Associate Judge NEVER required a “Sworn Inventory” from my spouse. This Associate Judge NEVER required ANY financial statements, no tax returns.. NOTHING!

My spouse was completely exempt from our Court Order TRO. He was allowed to recklessly spend $400,000 on his credit cards and use our Community Property funds to pay off ALL his debts. I was not allowed to present this Contempt of Court / TRO violation. I was informed by my Family Attorenys that the Associate Judge is NOT IN the MOOD to review any of my evidence and had NO interest in ANYTHING that I had to say.

I had to hire a Court Approved Forensic CPA who found and traced severe level of fraud and hiding community property assets. I was denied my Legal Rights to present this evidence in Court.

I was Completely denied ALL my Legal Rights, I was denied ANY and ALL my evidence, I was denied my Legal Rights to due Process by the Associate Judge. This Associate Judge made me stand before her while she called me vile names, she informed me that she can do whatever she wants to me and there is NOTHING Anyone can do to stop her.

This Associate Judge took away all my Legal Rights to my community property funds, ALL my access to my community property funds to survive on with our daughter during my divorce process leaving me to apply for Welfare and Food Stamps during my Divorce Process. I was denied Welfare and Food Stamps because I was still married. I endured horrific abuse at the hands of this Associate Judge. She took away all my legal rights to financial accountability of my estate. This Associate Judge disallowed
my Legal Rights to present evidence of Fraud committed by my spouse after the Associate Judge granted him the “RECEIVER” of our entire estate.

This Associate Judge had a Legal Responsibility to hold my spouse accountable of our estate when she granted him “RECEIVER” and 100% control of our Estate!

Opposing Attorney LIED nonstop! She aided my spouse in committing fraud. ALL this evidence was not allowed.

Opposing Attorney lied to the Associate Judge on income resulting in poverty level Child Support payments.

Actual Income was $337,297.00 via our Tax Returns that my spouse prepared himself as a Tax Attorney at the time of the Child Support Hearings. I was NOT Allowed ANY evidence. NOTHING.

Do to the SEVERE ABUSE, criminal misconduct and criminal Fraud that I endured in my Tarrant County Family Court system, I began to research all the Fraud and Corruption in the Family Courts around the Country to learn this is at an epidemic level of Fraud and Corruption in the Family Courts…

FRAUD
CORRUPTION
EXTORTION
SEVERE ABUSE
RACKETEERING….

Family Court Corruption in Minnesota…

1519291_512598112187580_1798888287_o

1519383_523716951075696_1157219508_o

1537480_522085231238868_1110390365_o

1553124_526951014085623_18023362_o

1556263_521572271290164_1407388869_o

1622390_529507103830014_47330268_o

1655498_524181274362597_1173847961_o

1780977_523153061132085_1315496330_o

1781336_519632108150847_687915524_o

1799207_528488580598533_1361018110_o

1836605_522681851179206_1625765630_o

1889003_527459467368111_577210856_o

1926202_529934243787300_153515863_o

1956813_530418467072211_1416920701_o

Wendy Archer Speaks out on the Corrupt Culture in the Tarrant County Family Courts…

Child Support FRAUD Committed by the Corrupt Lying Opposing Attorney – Tarrant County Family Courts

My Tarrant County Divorce Case is filled with FRAUD and Corruption-

In my Tarrant County Family Court Case, the Corrupt Lying Opposing Attorney flat out Lied to the
Associate Judge on income resulting in a major material impact on Child Support payments committing FRAUD and
aiding my ex spouse in committing FRAUD.

The Judge ruled on an $800 per month child support payment for our Daughter because the lying Corrupt Opposing Attorney
misrepresented the FACTS and FLAT OUT LIED to the Associate Judge on income.

Actual Income was $337,297.00 at the time of the Child Support Hearing.

The Opposing Attorney should be disbarred and jailed for her criminal misconduct throughout my divorce
case and her NON STOP lying in Court Hearings committing FRAUD and aiding in FRAUD.

Now the Opposing Attorney has filed a motion to eliminate Child Support for our Daughter after lying in Court AGAIN!!!
She requested a modification of Child Support Hearing claiming that I am receiving Child Support from another source and
she has requested that I pay her Attorney fees for this Hearing that she filed to eliminate Child Support
for our Daughter! And this Attorney has requested that I refund child support payments back to my ex spouse!

How bizarre is this! UNREAL!

First this Attorney Lies on Income resulting in the $800 child support payment then she has the gall to drag me back to
Court AGAIN and LIE AGAIN to the Associate Judge claiming that I am receiving Child Support from other sources!

The Tarrant County Family Court District Judge should make this Lying Corrupt Attorney pay for all the lost child support payments that I should have received for the past three years if this Attorney didn’t lie in Court Committing FRAUD and she should be required to pay triple in punitive damages for committing this FRAUD.

Case #324-502659-11

Divorce Corp… The Movie

Unfortunately this movie came out AFTER my horrific Tarrant County Family Court Experience…

Judges should not be granted immunity. They should be held accountable for their actions…

My ex spouse and his Corrupt lying Dirty Tactic Attorney lied nonstop during my entire Tarrant County Family Court Divorce…. their lying was off the charts
ridiculous. Unfortunately the Associate Judge chose to believe their lying and false charges…

The Opposing Attorney representing my ex spouse is a disgusting lying piece of garbage who aided my ex spouse
in committing FRAUD. She flat out lied to the District Judge… Her lying to the District Judge had a major material impact on my
divorce. She should be disbarred and jailed for her actions.

The Opposing Attorney in my Divorce Case was off the charts unethical with all her repeated requests for the same
information from my Family Attorneys, all her non stop notifications to my Family Attorneys, all her non stop
false accusations, false charges was horrific level of Legal Abuse.. For all her unethical business practices of
false charges and nonstop communications and demands for double and triple the same information was ridiculous !!

On top of all this, the Opposing Attorney flat out lied nonstop and aided my ex spouse in committing FRAUD..
She should be disbarred and jailed for her unethical criminal misconduct…

Every dog has their day. It’s only a matter of time that this Attorney will get away with her criminal misconduct.

Corrupt Culture in the Tarrant County Family Courts…. Wendy Archer Speaks out!

Criminal Investigations are needed in the Tarrant County Family Courts.

Associate Judge Beth Poulos has a bad reputation for her biased rulings and all her Hearings conducted in her Private Chambers along
with her name calling in her Court Room.

Cameras are needed in the Tarrant County Family Courts. What is allowed to go on in these Court Rooms is unbelievable!

Lauren A. Weir – Corna, Related to 3 Famous American Painters who were Professors at West Point Military Academy and Yale University… Completely stripped of ALL her Constitutional Legal Rights, Denied a Fair Trial….SEVERELY Punished and Tortured in the Tarrant County Family Courts, Fort Worth Texas, for filing a Grievance Against the Associate Judge with the Judiciary Committee during the Pendency of her Divorce….

Tarrant County Family Court, Fort Worth Texas
Case # 324-502659-11

Date filed: 8/24/2011

High Net Worth Divorce Case
multimillion Dollar Estate
19 year marriage

A “starving out” process resulting in a forced Divorce Settlement was definitely used in this Tarrant County Divorce Case…
It was all cooperated by the Associate Judge and all the Family Attorneys involved including Lauren’s own Attorneys who had
all the evidence of Fraud discovered by her Forensic CPA and was never allowed….

This should be illegal and considered coercion , however, in Divorce Court Judges can do whatever they want. There is no Law in Family Court.
Judges can literally do whatever they want….

_______________________________________________

Lauren A. Weir- Corna related to 3 Famous American Painters…. Robert W. Weir a Professor at West Point Military Academy,
John F. Weir a Professor at Yale University, and Julian Alden Weir of Weir Farm now a Historical Landmark..

Lauren A. Weir – Corna was in the Honors Art and Architecture at U of I in Chicago and is an artist herself… She also went to Business
School in Chicago, graduating top of her class with honors from Business School..

Lauren Web

______________________________________________________

Tarrant County Family Courts of Fort Worth Texas

Case # 324-502659-11

Lauren A. Weir – Corna was completely stripped of ALL her Legal Rights in the 324 Tarrant County Family Courts of Fort Worth, Texas for filing a grievance
with the Judiciary Committee on the Associate Judge during the pendency of her Divorce.

The Associate Judge was extremely biased from the beginning of their divorce process… Most of
the Hearings were conducted in the Associate Judge’s private chambers disallowing any evidence
or testimony from Lauren in her defense. Her Attorney’s informed her, Lauren, that the
Associate Judge was not in the mood to hear her or review her evidence…. But the Associate Judge was always in the
mood to make rulings on one sided evidence…

Lauren filed a grievance with the Judiciary Committee on the Associate Judge asking for their help and an emergency
intervention…

After Lauren filed her grievance with the Texas Judiciary Committee begging them for help and an emergency intervention which was shared with the Associate Judge and the Opposing Attorneys, who used the grievance repeatedly throughout the Divorce process … it became
quite clear that this Associate Judge was out for vengeance..

Lauren was completely stripped of her constitutional Legal Rights to a Fair Trial as a result of her grievance..

This grievance was shared with the Associate Judge and the Opposing Counsel
Confirmed by Judiciary Committee Attorney, Patrick Summers.

This grievance was used against Lauren throughout the pendency of her Tarrant County Divorce.

ALL of Lauren’s Family Attorneys informed her that she should NEVER have filed a grievance against the Associate Judge
during the pendency of her divorce….

It was a horrific level of Legal Harassment, elimination of ALL Legal Rights, NO evidence was allowed on Lauren’s behalf during
the entire Divorce Process as a result of her filing a grievance with the Judiciary Committee ….

Lauren was left to apply for Welfare and Food Stamps as a result of the Associate Judge’s rulings taking away all her access to her
community property funds to survive and support their daughter, the Judge took away ALL spousal support and ALL her access to community property funds while allowing Lauren’s spouse to transfer household expenses on to her… After granting Lauren’s spouse the “Receiver” of their entire estate and 100% control of their community property funds…

After the Associate Judge flat out REFUSED all Lauren’s evidence and found her guilty at ALL Hearings filed against her by the Opposing Attorney who used her grievance to sway the Judge, repeatedly throughout their divorce process …. The Associate Judge SEVERELY punished Lauren. Most of these Hearings were conducted in the Associate Judge’s private chambers and ruled on in the Judge’s Private chambers… Lauren’s Attorneys informed her that the Judge was not in the mood to hear her or review any of her evidence. Lauren was found guilty at ALL the Hearings filed against her by the Opposing Counsel.

Lauren was left to survive on only $800 per month in Child Support to live on and support their daughter. It was horrific abuse.. While Lauren’s spouse lived on $35,000.00 – $37,000.00 per month who is a Senior Officer, Top Executive, CFO and General Legal Counsel of 3 publically traded companies in Dallas… he was granted full access and use of community funds to pay off all his debts, all his bills as the sole “Receiver” of their entire estate by the Associate Judge..

Associate Judge did not require ANY financial accountability from Lauren’s spouse who the Judge granted sole “Receiver” of their entire estate.

Lauren was stripped of her legal rights to financial accountability of their entire community property estate by the Associate Judge.

Off the charts Horrific level of abuse and financial hardship as a result of the Associate Judge’s rulings.. This caused severe financial hardship impacting
Lauren’s credit, her ability to support their daughter and her ability to find a job in the Banking and Finance Industry as a graduate from Business School.

________________________________________________________

The Associate Judge had Court Ordered Lauren out of their Family home with no financial support,
no access to the couples Community Property funds.. but granting Lauren custody of her daughter with
no financial means to support her daughter…

Associate Judge also ruled that Lauren’s spouse is the “Receiver” of their entire estate and to manage
all their Community Property funds, he was to manage and pay for their estate during the pendency of their
Divorce…

No Sworn Inventory was required by the Associate Judge for his “Receivership”. No financial accountability was required by the Associate
Judge for granting Lauren’s spouse the “Receiver” of their entire estate… NOTHING.

The ONLY Inventory presented in Court was Lauren’s spouse’s “Household Inventory” list during January 2012 Hearing. This was agreed on
by both parties.

Lauren had filed a grievance with the Judiciary Committee begging for their help and an intervention…

Lauren A. Weir-Corna was completely stripped of her Legal Rights to financial accountability of their estate by the Associate Judge. No tax returns
were allowed, no financial statements were ever allowed in any Hearings. NOTHING.

The only financials allowed were EXCEL spread sheets prepared by Lauren’s spouse. No actual financial statements or any supporting documentation
for these EXCEL spread sheets were allowed or even required by the Associate Judge.

Most of the Court Hearings were conducted in the Judges private chambers so it’s unclear what was allowed during these Hearings. Lauren’s Family Attorneys kept
informing her that the Judge does not like her and was in no mood to Hear what she had to say or review any of her evidence.

Lauren requested a different Judge but was told that she had to keep this Judge for the duration of their Divorce.

Lauren had to hire a Court Approved Forensic CPA during the pendency of their Divorce, who established a multimillion dollar estate with significant value and traced major money transfers and major credit card spending and the use of their community funds to pay off all her spouse’s credit cards / debts during the pendency
of their divorce… approx. $400,000.00 of just his credit card debts and using the community property to pay all this off.

NONE of this evidence from Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPA was allowed in any Court Hearings.

This was an extremely messy divorce case in the Tarrant County Family Courts right from the get go…

CASE #324-502659-11

First Hearing, the Opposing Counsel claimed drug abuse, abandonment and long term extra marital affairs. Despite being Court Ordered for Forensic Drug Testing immediately following their first Hearing and ALL drug tests negative.. The Opposing Counsel repeatedly claimed Lauren was on drugs and needed special medical assistance, then claiming her children claimed that Lauren was on the verge of a nervous breakdown…When in fact her children NEVER made those claims and agreed to testify
to this.

There was no abandonment. Lauren’s spouse had actually demanded for a Divorce while they were on vacation in Sanibel. When they returned from their vacation, Lauren complied to his demands by leaving then filing for the Divorce…

There was no long term extra marital affairs. Lauren’s main witness to confirm this fact was not allowed to testify in her defense. He appeared many times in Court but was dismissed by the Associate Judge. None of Lauren’s witnesses were allowed. Lauren had brought several character witnesses to Court, they were all dismissed by the associate Judge and not allowed to testify on Lauren’s behalf.

While Lauren was in courses working on her Master’s degree in teaching and her coursework and credentials to teach Real Estate Law for a State Agency… Opposing Counsel still claimed that Lauren was on drugs needing special medical assistance and she wanted Laurens’ daughter to be removed from her care.

The Associate Judge allowed the two children to choose which parent they wanted to live with. Lauren’s daughter wanted to live with her and Lauren’s son picked his
father.

Lauren’s daughter is a straight “A” student, involved in school theater, and attends church 3 times per week raising money for the Youth Ministry for under privileged
children to attend Church Outings… She is working hard in school and working on her applications to several colleges..

Lauren’s 14 year old son was awarded to his father by the Associate Judge. While under the supervision of his Father, Lauren stopped over to their family home to visit with her son. Lauren caught her son purchasing illegal drugs from older boys using his $1200 per month allowance from his father to purchase illegal drugs from these older boys. Her son was also locked out of his father’s home several times on school nights while his father was out dancing all night in Dallas Dance Clubs on school nights… The children also mentioned that their father had women over for the weekend… Lauren requested custody of their son for his safety well being. The Opposing Attorney told the Associate Judge that Lauren was lying, out to have her son and his friends arrested and wanting money… The Associate Judge dismissed Lauren’s request for Custody of her son.

8 months later the two boys that Lauren’s son was purchasing illegal drugs from both died from illegal drug overdoses..

Children are not typically allowed in the Family Court Hearings. Despite Lauren’s children agreeing to testifying that the Opposing
Attorney made this all up in her notifications to Lauren’s family Attorney, Lauren was told that children are not typically allowed in Family
Court Hearings that they are assigned an Attorney.

The Opposing Counsel also made claims that Lauren was interfering with the sale of their Real Estate Holdings. Lauren has been in Real Estate
for many years as a Real Estate Broker, Certified Negations Specialist, a Texas State Licensed Loan Officer, Approved Instructor to teach Real Estate and worked in Mortgage Banking in Chicago for over 25 years…

Lauren was court ordered to sign their Southlake Home’s Listing agreement, despite the fact that the List price was $100,000 under market value. A factual CMA report was not allowed or reviewed by the Court. Their Southlake home was listed and sold for over $100,000.00 under market value resulting in a HUGE financial loss. This huge loss actually impacted the property values in their entire Southlake Subdivision.

Despite Lauren’s 25 plus years in Real Estate and Mortgage Banking, the Courts took away all her legal rights to their Real Estate holdings.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Summary-

After several early on biased rulings, Lauren Corna had filed a grievance with the Judiciary Committee on the Associate Judge
during the pendency of her Divorce begging for help and an emergency intervention from
the Judiciary Committee because she felt that the Judge was biased against her…

This grievance was shared with the Associate Judge and the Opposing Counsel, Marla Pittman.
Confirmed by Judiciary Committee Attorney, Patrick Summers.

Opposing Counsel immediately started to use Lauren’s Judiciary complaint filed against the Associate Judge to her advantage
by repeatedly informing both Judges of Lauren’s complaint against the Associate Judge…

Lauren’s Attorney’s informed her that she should never have filed a complaint against the Associate Judge.

Upon finally being granted financial Support starting 2/1/2012 by the Associate Judge, approx. 7 months after the
filing of the Divorce, Attorney Marla Pittman immediately began slamming Lauren with Harassment charges and
requesting the Associate Judge to eliminate spousal support, including claiming that their young daughter was harassing
her father.

In fact, Lauren’s spouse had been calling her nonstop DEMANDING that she settle on his Divorce Settlement or
he would have his Attorney file charges against her. When Lauren did not comply, she would be
“Served” papers to Appear in Court for “Contempt of Court” charges.

Lauren saved all his voice mail messages and her incoming cell phone log to prove to the Court that he was actually harassing
her nonstop… NONE of this evidence was allowed. Lauren was found guilty of harassment for answering her cell phone or returning
her spouse’s phone calls that he demanded for her to do. ALL saved on her cell phone and NOT allowed in any Court Hearings.

After Lauren’s spouse was granted their family home and required to manage their estate by the Associate Judge
as he was granted full control of all their community property funds…

Lauren’s spouse was completely exempt from the Court Order TRO. Despite all the evidence of his TRO violations that Lauren
had collected none of this was allowed in any court hearings. Lauren was told by her Attorneys that this would be presented
at the Final Hearing.

Lauren’s computer was removed from her Real Estate office by her spouse then given to a man hired by her spouse, an IT guy, who Lauren caught in the act and filed a police report. NOT allowed in any Court Hearings.

Lauren’s Forensic CPA had discovered that her spouse had forged her signature on her son’s college fund draining the entire College fund down to
$279.00.. Her spouse admitted to this in Court during their Jan. 2012 Hearing, but claimed Lauren gave him permission to forge her signature draining her college aged son’s account. This made sense to the Judge so there was no consequences for draining this entire college fund impacting Lauren’s son from going to college.

ALL Hearings filed against Lauren by the Opposing Counsel for harassment were conducted in the Associate Judge’s private chambers. NONE of Lauren’s
cell phone incoming phone logs or actual voice mail messages from her spouse were all not allowed in these Hearings conducted in the private chambers.
Lauren’s Attorney told her that he hopes that she brought her tooth brush because she was going to be arrested for harassment…. and she was informed that the Judge was not in the mood to review her evidence and was not interested in anything she had to say. Lauren was found guilty of harassment for answering her cell phone or returning
her spouse’s nonstop phone calls to her.

Lauren’s Family Attorney advised her to stop answering her cellphone.

The Associate Judge did not throw her in jail but she took kept reducing spousal support to punish her.

Child Support Hearing to determine Child support was held in the Judge’s Private Chambers. No tax returns were allowed or actual
income verification was allowed. The Associate Judge determined child support to be $800 per month for their daughter despite the
fact that actual income was $337,297.00 via their 2011 Tax Returns that Lauren’s spouse prepared himself as a Tax Attorney at the time of the Child Support Hearing, this Hearing was again conducted in the Judges Private chambers while Lauren was required to wait outside the Court Room. Lauren was shown that the Opposing Counsel had a paystub that she presented to the Judge to determine Child Support. Even though they had several investments that earned income and other income sources, this was not allowed in Child Support Hearings resulting in an $800 per month child support level..

10/31/2012 Hearing on Contempt of Court filed by Attorney Marla Pittman against Lauren for accessing the couples
safety deposit box. Lauren’s Attorney quit on her. He informed her that he did not have enough staff to keep
up with the Opposing Counsel’s non stop charges against her…. He further went on to say that the Opposing Counsel
must have a “unique” relationship with Lauren’s spouse to afford all these nonstop Hearings that his Attorney kept
filing against her…

The Opposing Counsel does have a “unique” relationship with Lauren’s ex spouse, the Opposing Counsel also has a business relationship with Lauren’s
now ex spouse…
______________________
Lauren’s spouse did have a “unique” relationship with his team of Attorneys handling his Divorce… Lauren’s spouse is a Senior Officer, Top Executive, CFO, and General Legal Counsel for 3 Publically traded companies and several privately held companies. His team of Attorneys for his Divorce were also his Corporate Attorneys, his outside Legal Counsel who handles many of his publically traded companies Lawsuits… Consequently, Lauren’s spouse’s Attorneys did have a “unique”
relationship with her spouse…
_______________________
10/31/2012 Hearing filed by Opposing Counsel for “Contempt of Court” against Lauren…
Her spouse had actually zeroed out their Wells Fargo bank accounts leaving zero balances. He had opened new Bank Accounts
with Southwest Banks and transferred all their funds to his new Bank Accounts… The annual safety deposit box
fee hit their accounts leaving a negative balance. Lauren went to their Bank to pay this fee and request a key since
she was paying for this safety deposit box. Her spouse had refused to give her a key to their safety deposit box.
Upon obtaining a key she noticed that her spouse had accessed their safety
deposit box and had it filled with money and not the two watches that he had testified to in early Court Hearings.

Opposing Counsel immediately filed “Contempt of Court” charges against Lauren. Hearing set for 10/31/2012.

Lauren appeared in this Hearing alone without Legal Representation. Opposing Counsel and the Associate Judge met
alone for approx. 45 minutes in the Judge’s private Chambers while Lauren was required to wait in the Court Room and fill
out a form by the Bailiff.

When the Opposing Counsel and the Judge finally emerged from the Judge’s private chambers, the Judge cleared out the court room.
Lauren had brought her adult son for support. The Judge made him leave her Court Room.

During this Hearing, the Opposing Counsel informed and announced to the Associate Judge that Lauren filed a complaint against the Associate Judge
with the Judiciary Committee and with the Texas Bar Association against the Opposing Counsel…. The Judge became furious with
Lauren. Lauren was not allowed any evidence during this Hearing. Lauren requested for an Attorney, the Judge said no. Lauren requested
community property funds to hire an Attorney, the Judge said no.

Lauren was found guilty of accessing the couple’s safety deposit
box despite the fact that her spouse had lied in previously hearings on the content of their safety deposit box, he actually violated
their TRO to hide money in their safety deposit box… ALL contents were awarded to the spouse.

The Associate Judge had Lauren stand before her… The Judge informed Lauren that she did not care that she filed a grievance with the Judiciary
Committee that any further complaints from her would be tossed in a pile and viewed only as an annoyance. The Judge called her disgusting and
despicable and that she can do anything that she wants to Lauren and there is nothing anyone can do to stop her including throwing her in jail.

After the Opposing Counsel informed the Associate Judge of her complaints to the Judiciary Committee and the Texas Bar.. The Associate Judge
was furious.

The Associate Judge then asked the Opposing Counsel if she wanted Lauren thrown in jail for accessing the safety deposit box. The Opposing Counsel
said no. The Opposing Counsel requested that ALL spouse support be removed, all Lauren’s access to community funds for her Legal Fees be prohibited and all her access to community property for her living expensed be removed. Opposing Counsel also asked the Court to allow Lauren’s spouse to transfer his storage facility lease and his
required rental payment to be transferred to Lauren.

Opposing Counsel also had Lauren’s Fidelity Account information from her separate property accounts that was being diverted to her husband’s Dallas office. Opposing Counsel requested that Lauren’s separate property Fidelity Accounts that she shared with her children be removed from her and transferred to
an out of state sister-in-law. Associate Judge ruled in favor of the Opposing Counsel’s request. Lauren was court ordered off her separate property accounts that she shared with her Children and was Court Ordered to transfer them to her out of state sister-in-law.

ALL spousal support was removed, all her access to community property funds were prohibited for Lauren’s Attorney fees and for living
expenses.

Lauren was left to survive on $800 per month in child support. She was left to apply for Welfare and Food Stamps. She was denied Welfare and Food stamps because
she was still married and their family income was $337,297.00 .. The Judge had ruled that Lauren was NOT allowed any access to their community property to survive on
and support her daughter.

While Lauren’s husband was living on $35,000 – $37,000 per month of the Couple’s community property, Lauren was left to survive on
$800 and support their daughter.

It was horrific level of abuse and punishment ….

Lauren took every penny she had and hired another Attorney, Steve King, of Fort Worth to Appeal this case, ask for financial support and take on her Divorce Case.

Lauren’s Appeal for December 2012 was cancelled by the District Judge. The Opposing Counsel had reminded the District Judge of Lauren’s complaint against the Associate Judge. The Appeal was cancelled and never allowed.

During the pendency of their Divorce;

Lauren’s credit was pulled and her credit cards were cancelled by her spouse
Lauren’s primary address was changed to her spouse’s Dallas Office… her mail was diverted to his Dallas office
Lauren’s spouse signed her up for “Lifelock” credit monitoring because opening new credit is a TRO violation
Lauren’s spouse took himself off their auto insurance to start a new policy for himself leaving this expense for Lauren despite this was a TRO violation
Lauren’s spouse moved from the family home to a small rental leaving Lauren with the financial responsibility of housing their 5000 square feet of household furnishings
Lauren’s spouse had leased a Storage facility, her spouse was allowed to transfer this lease and the monthly rent on to Lauren
Lauren’s spouse zeroed out their Wells Fargo accounts and opened new accounts and refused her access to the couple’s community funds
Lauren’s spouse removed all their financial information from their home to take to his office and locked their file cabinets

Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPA had traced that her spouse cashed in on Life Insurance Policies and depositing this in his new Accounts
at Southwest Bank.
Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPA had traced 100′s of thousands of dollars being transferred out of the couple’s accounts and deposited
in her spouse’s new Bank Accounts
Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPA had traced major credit card balances on her spouse’s credit cards and all being paid off with the couple
s community property funds…

Lauren had presented all this evidence to her Family Attorneys. She was told that all this evidence would be presented at the Final Hearing.

NONE of Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPAs evidence was EVER allowed in their Court Hearings.

Lauren was literally begging her Attorney’s for help nonstop…

Lauren was left to Apply for Welfare and Food Stamps, only to be denied since she was still married.

Lauren’s Attorney fees that she paid her Attorneys for constantly responding to the Opposing Counsel’s non stop charges against her soared to
close approx. $200,000.00.

Lauren requested her Attorneys nonstop for help… all her calls and emails begging for help were also eating up her Attorney fees. She was actually charged
Attorney fees requesting their HELP in her divorce. All her calls and emails requesting help from her Attorneys were completely ignored.

Do to the Opposing Counsel’s nonstop charges against Lauren, Lauren’s Attorneys would hold on to her case then abruptly quit on her. One Attorney informed Lauren that he did not have the staff to keep prepareing and responding to the Opposing Counsel’s non stop charges and her non stop notifications of her threats to file more charges.. This literally went on non stop by the Opposing Attorneys, constant threats, constant notifications, constant charges… it was horrific abuse by the Opposing Counsel.

Opposing Counsel repeatedly used Lauren’s grievance against the Associate Judge to remind both Judges at every hearing to sway the Judges and win her nonstop
lawsuits / motions that she filed against Lauren… Lauren was found guilt at ALL the hearings and severely punished by the Judges.

Do to the Judges rulings on no spousal support and no access to the couples Community funds as punishment for filing a grievance against the Associate Judge, Lauren was SEVERELY harmed financially by the Judges rulings.

While Lauren and her daughter was left to live on only $800 in child support by the Associate Judge who took away all spousal support and all access to the couples community funds, Lauren’s spouse was living on $35,000.00- $37,000.00 per month.

It’s unclear how the Associate Judge determined only $800 in child support since the couples income according to their Tax Returns was $337,297.00 at the time
the Associate Judge determined child support.

Horrific abuse and torture by the Courts…

Lauren was left to apply for Welfare and Food Stamps because of the Associate Judge’s biased rulings and punishing her for filing a grievance with the Judiciary Committee.

Lauren was denied Welfare and Food Stamps because she was NOT divorced yet and their tax returns showed $337,297.00 income.

No evidence was allowed on Lauren’s behalf at ANY Hearings. Lauren was told by her Attorneys that the Judge was not in the mood to review her evidence and was not
interested in ANYTHING she had to say.

All of Laurens’ Attorneys repeatedly informed her that she should never have filed a grievance against the Associate Judge.

2/12/2013 Hearing..
Lauren’s Attorney wanted to withdraw. He had filed for a withdrawal. Lauren Begged her Attorney to not quit on her. He agreed to help her.
Opposing Attorney told Lauren’s Family Attorney that they did not have any community property to divide other than two retirement accounts and a fidelity account under the Grandma’s name. This was it.

Both the Opposing Attorney and Lauren’s spouse told the Judge that this was all the couple had, the two taxable retirement accounts and the Grandma’s Fidelity account that was a gift to both of them… The District Judge asked the couple if they split up their “Household items” according to their Inventory List and they both said yes. Lauren’s spouse and his Attorney presented their “Household Inventory” during their Jan. 2012 Hearing and it was all agreed to. The District Judge asked the Opposing Attorney if she filed this Inventory with the Courts and she said yes.

After this Hearing on 2/12/2013, The Opposing Attorney prepared the Final Decree and added several Accounts and Investments that were never agreed to at the 2/12/2013 Hearing or ever discussed during the 2/12/2013 Hearing. Opposing Attorney added A referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 which she added to the Final Decree but did not include this document with the Final Decree or any financial supporting financial statements. This Financial Sworn Inventory was switched out from their agreed upon “household inventory” to this referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012.

4/2/2013 Final Hearing

Still no Court Order Forensic CPA evidence was allowed at the Final Hearing which was promised to Lauren all along. NONE of this evidence was ever presented or allowed
on Lauren’s behalf.

Lauren’s Attorney showed up to the Final Hearing with 3 different Divorce Decrees. They met in a conference room outside the Court Room. Her Attorney had her review all 3 of the Final Decrees. Lauren did not agree with any of them, especially the one the Opposing Attorney prepared adding SEVERAL accounts and investments and a referenced Sworn Inventory dated 8/24/2012 and NOT included with the Final Decree. At this point there was still no “Sworn Inventory” presented to Laure as it was referenced in the Opposing Attorney’s Final Decree. Lauren was in tears. Her Attorney told her to wait in the conference room…

Lauren’s Attorney left the conference room and approached her spouse and the Opposing Attorney and began to yell at them for being Crooks and violating the TRO nonstop.

During the Hearing, while Lauren was sitting in the general seating area in the Court Room waiting for her Hearing to begin, the Opposing Attorney walked in and straight up to the District Judge’s bench. The Opposing Attorney had a Final Decree in her hands.

Lauren’s Attorney came in and handed her his motion to withdraw as her Attorney. He said their Divorce is over so he wanted her to sign his motion to withdraw. As she was required to sign his motion to withdraw and a “Power of Attorney” releasing all her Legal Rights to their condo, the Opposing Counsel handed a Final Decree to the Judge.

Still no Court Approved Forensic CPAs evidence was allowed at this Hearing as Lauren fully expected and promised by her Family Attorneys.

After this Final Hearing, Lauren was not allowed to see which of the Final Decrees was handed to the Judge. She was not given a copy of the Final Decree.

Lauren had to go to yet another Family Attorney the next day to obtain a copy of the Final Decree only to discover that ALL their Community Property was awarded to her ex spouse. There was still no available “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 as part of the Final Decree. Only a reference to a Sworn Inventory dated 8/24/2012.

Lauren met with SEVERAL Family Attorneys who advised her to file for a New Trial for fraud and deceit since there was no Sworn Inventory dated 8/24/2012 as part of the Final Decree.

Lauren filed for a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit since there was no agreed to “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 as part of the Final Decree or ever agreed to at any time.. The Final Decree was signed by the District Judge without reviewing the Opposing Attorney’s referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 that she added to the Final Decree and NEVER agreed to…

Lauren filed for a motion for a New Trial on May 2, 2013. Hearing was set for 6/12/2013.

Before this Hearing began, Lauren’s Attorney’s informed her that she was probably not going to be given a New Trial. Her Attorneys informed her
that she should NEVER have filed a grievance against the Associate Judge during the pendency of her Divorce and that the Judge did not like her.

During this Hearing for a New Trial on 6/12/2013, Opposing Attorney Appeared alone. The Opposing Attorney told the District Judge that her client, Lauren’s ex spouse, that the referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 in the Divorce Decree that the Opposing Attorney prepared herself… then claimed to the District Judge that her referenced Sworn Inventory dated 8/24/2012 was prepared at the ONSET of their Divorce and she had receipts from all of Lauren’s Family Attorney’s to prove that she provided their Sworn Inventory to ALL of Lauren’s Attorneys… When in fact it was NOT prepared at the ONSET of the Divorce as the Opposing Attorney claimed to the District Judge… The ONSET of the Divorce was actually 8/24/2011. The Opposing Attorney flat out lied to the District Judge….

The Onset of the Divorce: 8/24/2011
Their Sworn Inventory was dated: 8/24/2012

The District Judge ruled against Lauren’s request for a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit…. The Opposing Attorney requested that Lauren be required to pay her Attorney fees. The Judge ruled in favor of the Opposing Counsel despite the fact that their Sworn Inventory was actually prepared 12 months AFTER the onset of their Divorce and it was impossible for the Opposing Attorney to have given their Inventory to all of Lauren’s Attorneys as the Opposing Counsel told the District Judge since she had several Family Attorneys before 8/24/2012… .

The Judge ruled in favor of the Opposing Counsel and required that Lauren be required to pay ALL Attorney fees, including the Opposing Attorney’s legal fees.

Lauren was denied a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit and she was required to pay all Attorney fees including the Opposing Counsel’s legal fees.

NONE of the Court Approved Forensic CPAs evidence was allowed in any Court Hearings.

ALL of the Couples financial Assets, investments, brokerage accounts, bank accounts, cash assets, were ALL awarded to her ex spouse accept portions of two retirement accounts and the grandma’s $15,000 gift to the couple.. They had a multimillion dollar estate…

This is a shocking case in the Tarrant County Family Courts…

Lauren has had SEVERAL Family Attorneys all over the Dallas Fort Worth area review her case and are all shocked by it.

The Opposing Counsel’s referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 document awarding the couples assets all to her ex spouse was never required as part of the Final Decree…

None of Lauren’s Court Approved Forensic CPA’s evidence was allowed… She was told by her Attorneys that she should never have filed a grievance against the Associate
Judge during the pendency of her divorce…

Lauren Corna was completely destroyed and SEVERELY punished by the 324 Tarrant County Family Courts for filing a grievance with the Judiciary Committee which was shared with the Associate Judge and the Opposing Attorneys… all confirmed by the Texas Judiciary Committee Attorney, Patrick Summers.

Wendy Archer speaks out on her Tarrant County Family Court experience….

Lauren A. Weir – Corna is related to Famous American Painters… Robert W. Weir, John F. Weir, and Julian Alden Weir

Robert W. Weir a Professor at West Point Military Academy

John F. Weir a Professor at Yale University, Weir Hall at Yale University is named after Lauren’s Family

Julian Alden Weir of Weir Farm ….

Lauren A. Weir – Corna comes from a Patriotic Family… Her Father served in the U.S. Navy who taught survival skills, her older brother, Greg severed
in the Marines and was stationed in Iraq for two years. Lauren’s son, Michael, served in the Marines and was stationed in Japan during
the tsunami….

oliver north and greg

74583_172752769416799_100000462321906_566482_8334802_n

Senior Officer, CFO General Legal Counsel Louis Corna gets off only paying $800 in Child Support for their Daughter, NOW he has filed for a motion eliminating his Parental Responsibility of paying the $800 in Child Support !!!

Senior Officer, General Legal Counsel, Louis Corna got off only paying
$800 in child Support for his Daughter and all their Community Property was
awarded to Louis Corna as part of a referenced Sworn Inventory allowed in the
Final Divorce Decree…accept for a small portions of retirement funds granted
to his ex wife

Apparently Community Property Laws did not apply in this Divorce..

Louis Corna’s ex wife had filed a grievance with the Judiciary Committee against the Associate Judge during the
pendency of their Divorce. This grievance with the Judiciary Committee filed on the Associate Judge was shared with the
Associate Judge and the Opposing Attonrey, Marla Pittman, confirmed by Judiciary Committee
Attorney, Patrick Summers.

This grievance against the Associate Judge was used repeatedly over and over and over again during Court Hearings filed
by the Opposing Attorney when she filed charges against Louis Corna’s ex wife claiming harassment. Opposing Counsel
used this grievance against the Associate Judge to win her charges that she filed against Louis Corna’s ex wife.

Louis Corna’s ex wife’s Family Attorneys informed her that she should NEVER have filed a grievance against the Associate
Judge during the pendency of her Divorce. The Associate Judge REFUSED all her evidence, all her witnesses and refused Louis Corna’s
ex wife to testify in her defense at ALL these Hearings filed against her by the Opposing Counsel.

Despite requesting for a different Judge many times, Louis Corna’s ex wife’s Attorney’s informed her that she had
to stick with the same Judges for the duration of their Divorce Hearings..

No evidence, no witnesses and no testimony was allowed on Louis’ Corna’s ex wife’s behalf in any Court Hearings
to defend her against the Opposing Counsel’s nonstop charges that she filed against her. Louis Corna’s ex wife’s
Attorneys informed her that she should never have filed a grievance against
the Associate Judge…. The Opposing Counsel used Louis Corna’s ex wife’s grievance against the Associate Judge
at all these Hearings..

Louis Corna’s ex wife was found guilty at all Hearings filed against her by the Opposing Counsel.

19 years of marriage..

Ex wife received small portions of retirement funds. The rest of their entire estate was
awarded to Louis Corna according to the Final Decree on file and a referenced Sworn Inventory
awarding EVERYTHING to Louis Corna.

How is it that this Senior Officer, Executive, General Legal Counsel, gets off only paying
$800 in child support?

What criteria was used by the Tarrant County Family Courts to determine Child Support??

Now Louis Corna and his Attorney Marla Pittman have filed a motion to eliminate
child support for his Daughter..

According to their Tarrant County Family Court case, Attorney Marla Pittman filed endless charges against Louis Corna’s
ex wife …

Their Final Divorce Decree awards Louis Corna with all their ASSETS accept two
small portions of two retirement accounts.

NO “Sworn Inventory” was filed with the Court but is referenced in the Final Decree granting
everything on this missing “Sworn Inventory” to Louis Corna.

A “Sworn Inventory” is ONLY referenced in their Final Decree awarding Louis Corna
all the couple’s community property on this referenced Sworn Inventory..

Why is this “Sworn Inventory” document NOT part of or included in the Final Decree?

Did the Judge sign off on the Final Decree without reviewing the referenced “Sworn Inventory” that is
part of a 6/12/2013 Hearing filed by Louis Corna’s ex wife for a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit?

Divorced filed: 8/24/2011
Sworn Inventory date: 8/24/2012

How is it that ALL their Community Property listed on Louis Corna’s Sworn Inventory was not required
as part of their Final Divorce Decree and ONLY referenced??

Post Divorce Lawsuits in Dallas County filed by Marla Pittman claims that Louis Corna does not have STDs and that his
ex wife made this all up to embarrass, harass and extort monies out of Louis Corna.

Louis Corna does have long term STDs, there are no lawsuits filed by his ex wife extorting monies out of
Louis Corna.

Their Dallas Lawsuit also claims that his ex wife abandoned the family home and never looked back. According to Tarrant
County, Louis Corna was actually granted the Family Home by the Judge and his ex wife was court ordered out of the Family
home.

Is this abandonment or a court order to move out?

Tarrant County Family Court file it shows that Louis Corna does have STDs via his own admissions to being diagnosed with Herpes and
Genital Warts (HPV) and exposing his wife to his known diseases while she was pregnant with their daughter…

She has since been diagnosed with early stages of cervical cancer from being exposed to (HPV)

Case 324-502659-11 date 10/3/2012

Senior Executive, CFO Tax Attorney Louis Corna sues his ex- wife in the Dallas Courts claiming that he does not have STDs AFTER admitting to his Herpes and Genital Warts (HPV) in the Tarrant County Family Courts that he got 14 Years before they even met… SHOCKING ..

After a Divorce in the Tarrant County Family Courts, Senior Executive, CFO Tax Attorney, Louis Corna, sued his ex wife in the Dallas Courts for $15,000 AFTER claiming that he DOES NOT have STDs, that his ex wife made it all up to harass, embarrass and extort monies out of him.

Dallas County Court Lawsuit DC-13-05221

In fact, Louis Corna does have long term Herpes and Genital Warts (HPV) that he admitted to in Tarrant County
Family Courts on Public Records! He admits to being diagnosed to Herpes and Genital Warts (HPV)

Tarrant County Family Court Case # 324-502659-11

Louis Corna’s ex wife Appeared ALONE for their Dallas County Lawsuit against her, she had no Legal Representation. Louis Corna’s Attorney, Marla Pittman did not notify her Tarrant County Family Attorney on File leaving Louis Corna’s ex wife to Appear for
their Lawsuit alone without Legal Representation…

This is known as Dirty Tactics and unethical business practices…

Louis’s ex wife was not given her Legal Rights to an Attorney during this Hearing.

Their Dallas Lawsuit also claims that Louis Corna’s ex wife abandoned their Family home and never looked back… when in fact Louis Corna was actually granted their family home by their Tarrant County Family Court Judge. Misrepresentation of facts..

His ex wife NEVER abandoned their family home…

Louis Corna and his Attorney Marla Pittman also claimed in the Dallas Courts that Louis Corna was cooperative in their Tarrant County Divorce and split their Community Property 50/50. This is again completely not true. Their Community Property was NOT split 50/50 as they both claimed in court…

Louis Corna’s Attorney, Marla Pittman actually prepared their Final Decree adding an after-the-fact, never agreed to, referenced Financial “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 awarding all the couples ASSETS to Louis Corna, then not including this “Sworn Inventory” document as it was handed to the District Judge by Attorney Marla Pittman..

Louis Corna’s ex wife had filed for a New Trial in Tarrant County Family based on “Fraud and Deceit” in the Tarrant County Family Courts because she was not provided their referenced “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 mentioned in the Divorce Decree or ever agreed to their Sworn Inventory…. Attorney Marla Pittman Appeared alone for this Hearing on 6/12/2013 claiming to the District Judge that her Client, Louis Corna, prepared the referenced Financial “Sworn Inventory” dated 8/24/2012 at the ONSET of their Divorce, the ONSET of their Divorce was actually on 8/24/2011. Louis Corna’s ex wife was denied a New Trial based on Fraud and Deceit…

Attorney Marla Pittman only submitted a partial Final Decree as evidence in the Dallas Courts. Marla Pittman did not include Louis Corna’s Sworn Inventory dated 8/24/2012 which was ALL of the Couples ASSETS and ALL awarded to Louis Corna.

Again, another false statement in their Dallas Lawsuit..

Louis Corna’s ex wife NEVER extorted money out of Louis Corna at any time as he claimed in his Dallas Lawsuit.
As a matter of fact, the Tarrant County Family Courts left his ex wife with NO medical insurance to continue her medical treatments for her early stages of
cervical cancer that she was diagnosed with as a result of being exposed to Louis Corna’s Genital Warts (HPV).

In Tarrant County Family courts as part of their Divorce, Louis Corna admits to having
Long Term Herpes from the 1980s 14 years before they even met, Along with Genital Warts
(HPV) and having procedures to burn off his warts.. Case # 324-502659-11 dated 10/03/2012
Louis admits to being diagnosed with herpes and Genital Warts (HPV)…

According to Tarrant County Public Records, Louis Corna informed his ex wife of his long term
STDs while she was pregnant with their daughter.

This is actually sexual assault..

His ex wife was diagnosed with early stages of cervical cancer as a result of being exposed to HPV.

Tarrant County Family Court case #324- 502659-11 10/03/2012 Hearing

Louis Corna’s own Attorney, Marla Pittman, is VERY aware of his STDs because she filed for a Summary Judgment Hearing in the Tarrant County Family Courts which includes Louis Corna’a own admission to his STDs on Public Records. Date of this Hearing filed by his Attorney 10/3/2012.
Attorney Marla Pittman cancelled her own Hearing the day before it was set to be Heard in the Tarrant County Family Courts.

Louis Corna’s Attorney representing him in Tarrant County Family courts, Marla Pittman also filed the
Dallas Lawsuit.

I guess it wasn’t enough that this guy walked away with almost their entire estate according to their
Tarrant County Final Divorce Decree..

His ex wife was granted two small portions of two retirement funds of approx. $190,000.
Her legal fees were approx. $200,000.00.

I guess it wasn’t enough to expose her to his long term STDs and leave her with almost nothing. Then
he files this Dallas Lawsuit claiming that he DOES NOT have STDs!

Louis Corna has been married several times. This ex wife is believed to be his 4th wife.

None of Louis Corna’s other wives gave him children.

So this woman who gave him two children, he exposes her to his long term STDs that he got 14 years prior to their
marriage, then he sues her in the Dallas Courts claiming that he does not have STDs.

Is this Fraud?
Is this extortion?

Other Fraud Lawsuits involving Louis Corna…

Hometown 2006-1 1925 Valley View LLC v. Prime Income Asset Management LLC et al
Case Number:
3:2013cv00747

Hometown 2006-1 1925 Valley View LLC v. Prime Income Asset Management LLC et al
Case Number:
2:2013cv01664

Hometown 2006-1 1925 Valley View LLC v. Prime Income Asset Management LLC et al
Case Number:
3:2013cv04440

There seems to be a culture of corruption in the Tarrant County Family Courts..